Skip to content
WooRanked

Wooranked / Resources

What makes a publisher a good fit?

A practical checklist covering page relevance, metric provenance, editorial history and commercial link disclosure.

Publisher selection is a context decision, not a single-number score. Use this checklist to identify what you know, what the source reports and what still needs confirmation.

Read the actual publication

Inspect recent articles, author information and editorial consistency. Decide whether the publication serves the audience you want to reach. A category label alone is not evidence of fit.

Check the page, not only the domain

For an insertion, read the existing article and the surrounding passage. For a guest post, compare the proposed topic with the publication’s coverage. The resource should contribute to the reader’s task.

Ask where metrics came from

Record the provider, measurement date and meaning of every number. Third-party authority scores are not Google metrics. Traffic estimates may differ across providers; unexplained or conflicting values should remain unknown.

Clarify commercial and editorial terms

Check current availability, supported format, writing responsibility, approval rights, price and delivery expectations. Keep site approval distinct from approval of exact copy or anchor text.

Qualify paid links appropriately

Google treats links bought for ranking purposes as link spam. Advertising and sponsorship links should use appropriate sponsored or nofollow attributes. Do not confuse a completed placement with guaranteed search performance.

Keep a useful delivery record

Record the published URL, agreed content, destination and link attributes. Any replacement or monitoring obligations should be explicitly agreed rather than inferred from another provider’s offer.

Primary reference: Google Search spam policies. This guide is educational; it is not a completed audit of the catalog.

Apply the checklist

Record evidence and unknowns separately.

A simple review note

For each candidate, record the topic you inspected, the audience it appears to serve, a relevant article and the reason your resource might help that reader. Then list questions about format availability, metrics and commercial terms. Keep an observation separate from an assumption, especially when the source record is old or incomplete.

When to hold a candidate back

Pause a recommendation when the topic fit is unclear, the proposed page is unavailable, the metric source cannot be explained or the quote leaves important responsibilities undefined. An unresolved question does not prove a publisher is unsuitable, but it should not be disguised as a completed quality check.

Is a category label enough evidence?

No. It helps organize discovery, but you still need to inspect the actual content and proposed page or topic.